Putting your portfolio performance into perspective
Reviewing your investment performance over time is important when tracking your progress toward your financial goals. However, before evaluating your performance, you’ll first need to determine the return needed to achieve your objectives.
What you need to know
To help put your investment performance into perspective, your return expectations should be:
- Relevant - Based on the goals you‘re trying to achieve (and not a market index)
- Realistic - Based on your asset allocation, comfort with risk, the market environment and your investment time horizon.
- Reviewed – Evaluated over time to help ensure you remain on trackc to reach your goals.
Ultimately, your actual investment return should be compared to the return necessary to help achieve your financial goals
The challenges of comparing performance to a market index
Some investors compare their portfolio’s returns to a broad index, such as the S&P TSX Composite or the S&P 500 in the U.S., and then question why they underperformed or outperformed the index at certain times. Though these individual indexes can provide insight into the general performance of stocks or bonds, they are usually not a relevant comparison to your portfolio’s performance. It’s important to consider that:
A market index doesn’t account for your personal goals or comfort with risk.
For example, if your goal is to produce retirement income, you’d likely have a mix of equities and fixed-income investments. But measuring your portfolio’s returns against those of a stock index wouldn’t be an appropriate comparison, since your portfolio would include the risk and returns associated not only with stocks but with fixed-income investments as well.
Indexes are generally not diversified across different types of investments.
That’s why they often have wider swings in value compared to a well-diversified portfolio. To achieve the extreme highs of an index, you also must be willing to accept the extreme lows.
Your performance is affected by your contributions and withdrawals, while market index returns are not.
Investing also carries expenses and fees that are not included in index returns.
Ultimately, your investment portfolio should be designed to help you reach specific financial objectives, so its performance should be evaluated against the return you need to reach them.
Your return expectations should be relevant
First and foremost, your return expectations should be relevant, meaning they should be based on your specific goals. These goals should be established by working with your financial advisor. When you’re unsure of what you’re aiming for, it can be difficult to know whether you’re on target or if adjustments need to be made.
Once you’ve set your goals — for example, retiring at age 60 or helping fund half of your child’s education expenses — work with your financial advisor to determine the return you’ll need to achieve them. Then, when you’re evaluating your performance, your actual return should be compared to this return — the return you need to help achieve your goals, not the market’s return.
Your return expectations should be realistic
While most people want to earn very high returns with minimal risk, this is unrealistic. In general, your portfolio’s return will depend on several factors, including the market environment, your asset allocation (your mix of investments) and your investment holding period.
- Market environment — Consider your return expectations in light of our long-term outlook for economic growth, corporate profits, inflation and interest rates to help ensure your forward-looking estimates remain realistic. As economic and market conditions change, our return expectations will as well. So, it’s important to review this outlook periodically.
- Asset allocation — Your portfolio’s allocation to different asset classes can determine as much as 90% of how your returns may vary over time.1 If you own a well-diversified portfolio, with exposure to many different asset classes, your expected return should be a blend of our expectations for each.
Your asset allocation should align with your long-term financial goals and your comfort with risk. For example, the greater the return you need to meet your goals, the more you should consider investing in stocks. However, risk and return go hand in hand, so the more you invest in stocks, the higher the risk (or chance for higher volatility) you’ll take on.
This chart shows the potential long-term average annual returns for different portfolio objectives based on our current market assumptions.
This chart shows the potential long-term average annual returns for different portfolio objectives based on our current market assumptions.
- Investment holding period — The market rarely has an average year, so you shouldn’t expect to hit your long-term average annual return estimate every year. For example, though the S&P TSX Composite Index has had an average annual return of 9.9%, including dividends, since 19772, there have only been six times when its annual return has been between 8% and 12%, equating to an occurrence of only 13% over 46 years.
Additionally, when reviewing your historical return, consider the market environment over that
same period. It’s important to connect what’s happening across the market to your portfolio. Focusing on what you can control and sticking to your long-term financial strategy during short-term market dislocations can help keep you on track.
This chart shows how the historical returns of a hypothetical portfolios have higher odds of a positive return over longer time horizons.
This chart shows how the historical returns of a hypothetical portfolios have higher odds of a positive return over longer time horizons.
While short-term returns can fluctuate, the table above shows that, in general, the longer you own your investments, the more likely your returns will be positive and the closer your return could be to the long-term average. The table also highlights how volatility, or the amount a portfolio fluctuates, may differ when the asset allocation is different. While a greater stock allocation may lead to a higher long-term expected return, you should also expect more volatility, especially in the short term. As you evaluate your portfolio’s performance, you should compare its long-term returns to the rate you determined you needed to reach your financial goals — paying less attention to short-term performance differences along the way.
Your return objectives should be reviewed
You and your financial advisor should conduct a thorough review of your portfolio and financial position, including your personal rate of return, at least annually. Regular performance reviews over time can help determine whether you’re making progress toward achieving your financial goals.
During your review, you may confirm everything is going according to plan. If not, you may decide to make some changes, such as:
- Rebalancing your portfolio — Bringing your investments back into alignment with your objectives and comfort with risk
- Adjusting your asset allocation — To align with changes to your goals
Remember that even though performance can be volatile in the short run, your decisions should be made with a long-term outlook in mind, not in reaction to short-term fluctuations.
While reviewing your performance is a critical step, it’s only part of the overall review process. You should also review your overarching goals and objectives because any changes to these could influence your return objectives. This could also mean adjusting your savings or spending to help you reach your long-term financial goals.
Your role in your portfolio’s performance
One of the biggest obstacles to reaching our long-term goals isn’t investment performance, it’s our own actions. Investors tend to overreact to short-term market volatility and chase performance — buying investments that recently performed well and selling those that didn’t — instead of sticking with a long-term strategy.
Chasing performance is a recipe for underperformance, according to a 2023 investor behavior study by DALBAR. The average investor’s portfolio performed much worse overall than the S&P 500 over the past 30 years. This didn’t happen because investors owned the wrong investments but because they chased performance — they bought investments when they were up and sold after the value dropped. Tracking and reviewing performance is important, but it can be a double-edged sword.
Don’t let your reaction to short-term swings in the market get in the way of achieving your long-term goals.
This chart shows that, historically, the average equity investor has underperformed the S&P 500.
This chart shows that, historically, the average equity investor has underperformed the S&P 500.
How are you doing?
We recommend reviewing your goals and objectives with your financial advisor at least once a year as well as when your personal situation changes. Your financial advisor can help you review your current performance in the context of your long-term goals and our expectations for future performance. More important, you’ll review how that performance affects progress toward your long-term goals and whether any changes need to be made to keep you (or put you back) on track. Ultimately, the best way to measure performance is by comparing it to the progress you have made toward reaching your financial goals.
Important information:
1 Source: “Determinants of Portfolio Performance II: An Update,” Gary P. Brinson, Brian D. Singer and Gilbert L. Beebower, Financial Analysts Journal, 1991.
2 Morningstar Direct. S&P/TSX Composite Index; 1/3/1977 - 12/31/2022. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly and are not meant to depict an actual investment.